Gentoo Archives: gentoo-hardened

From: Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@××××××.be>
To: gentoo-hardened@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-hardened] docker updates
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 07:36:06
Message-Id: CAPzO=NwaDBEJ20tS1jXpn9ie=nRKFBiEMx1sU=5S6dEJyJDMgQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-hardened] docker updates by eric gisse
1 On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 3:58 AM, eric gisse <jowr.pi@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > Let's turn this around.
3 >
4 > What is the business case for containerization when security is so
5 > loose and ill-defined right now?
6
7 The promise (and depending on your context and regulations, this might
8 be true already as well) is that you can offer faster deployment of
9 application(s).
10
11 For instance, without containers development teams might need to
12 deploy to a non-production environment that is "shared" for all teams,
13 requiring rigid change management processes to make sure projects
14 don't step on other projects' toes.
15
16 With containers, development teams deploy their containers on a
17 non-production docker cluster without impact to other development
18 teams.
19
20 Security requirements here are a bit less than in production (due to
21 the non-production environment). When changes are matured, then change
22 management can bring this to the (non-Docker) production environment.
23
24 There are also of course possibilities to use containers in
25 production, but then the security management needs to be taken into
26 account again (which is definitely doable, just requires some
27 "different" thinking).
28
29 Wkr,
30 Sven Vermeulen