| 1 |
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 10:37:58PM -0500 or thereabouts, Eric Sammer wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is interesting. At risk of starting YA-Flame-War, I'd (personally) |
| 3 |
> like to get a base system back end working before we get into pausing |
| 4 |
> between steps and allowing users to muck around. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I fully agree with this. Getting at least a proof-of-concept up and |
| 7 |
running that shows how the process works, even if it doesn't have a full |
| 8 |
feature set, will be a huge feather in our hat. Right now, we have the |
| 9 |
"10,000 other failed install projects" monkey on our back and producing |
| 10 |
something real will help to knock that off as soon as possible. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'm a big fan of getting some features in 1.0, other features in 1.1 and |
| 13 |
still others in 2.0. Trying to do everything in 0.1 is a sure recipe for |
| 14 |
failure. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
--kurt |
Archives