Gentoo Archives: gentoo-installer

From: Michael Crute <mcrute@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-installer@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later?
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:28:19
Message-Id: 558b73fb0510201328y7950cadajd1e03e0ade0e9da9@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-installer] Gentoo installer vs current installation method, what about later? by Andrew Gaffney
On 10/20/05, Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@g.o> wrote:
> > Michael Crute wrote: > > On 10/20/05, *Mike Rosset* <schizoid29@×××××.com > > <mailto:schizoid29@×××××.com>> wrote: > > > > I've all ready asked for those and got shot down appartently Chris > > wont release them. Also Chris will try to bump this to another list > > releng, more then likely > > > > > > Why not release them? Is this not open source? What's so secret about an > > > iso image? > > Let's not start this again. It comes down to this: > > * they are a work in progress, constantly changing > * they don't work with the released version of catalyst >
OK, fine, thats good enough for me. I dont want to start some war between Chris and Mike. Another idea though, why not patch catalyst so they work and release them. For pete sake people this is open source, must we bicker about "proprietary" shit? In any case I am perfectly happy with the minimal CD as it is now, I'm more curious than anything about these secret spec files. -Mike -- ________________________________ Michael E. Crute Software Developer SoftGroup Development Corporation Linux, because reboots are for installing hardware. "In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?"

Replies