| 1 |
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:10:58 +0000, Alistair Bush wrote: |
| 2 |
[...] |
| 3 |
>> >> Finally, I was amazed to read that maven is, apparently, |
| 4 |
>> >> windows-centric. Very disappointing. |
| 5 |
>> > |
| 6 |
>> > Any source on this? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> This mailing list. There were complaints about maven being |
| 9 |
>> windows-centric. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Without reading back to see what esactly 'window-centric' means. This may |
| 12 |
> explain why gentoo doesn't support maven currently. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
first, a quick note, gotta go. second, glad to know the state of java's |
| 16 |
better than I thought, my info was out of date. thifrdly, here's the quote: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
"ant is a very good cross-platform tool. Maven OTOH seems to have been |
| 19 |
specified by windows people for windows people. Unfortunately an awful |
| 20 |
lot of projects target windows nowadays." |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
from: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
From: Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot@...> |
| 25 |
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [architecture] Re: JPackages and ObjectWeb] |
| 26 |
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.jpackage.general, gmane.linux.debian.devel.java, gmane.linux.gentoo.java |
| 27 |
Date: 2004-02-01 18:13:30 GMT (2 years, 31 weeks, 4 days, 8 hours and 28 |
| 28 |
minutes ago) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.jpackage.general/4360/match=maven+windows> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
err, I don't think that url will work... |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
of course, I'm just now noticing the date.... |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-Thufir |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
Archives