| 1 |
On Saturday 09 September 2006 23:19, Thufir wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 00:05:44 +0200, Krzysiek Pawlik wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Thufir wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> I've been sifting through the archives on these topics and would like a |
| 5 |
> >> status report on java. stat ;) |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > One will be posted tomorrow after todays team meeting. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Lucky timing for me, then :) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> >> Finally, I was amazed to read that maven is, apparently, |
| 12 |
> >> windows-centric. Very disappointing. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Any source on this? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> This mailing list. There were complaints about maven being |
| 17 |
> windows-centric. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Without reading back to see what esactly 'window-centric' means. This may |
| 20 |
explain why gentoo doesn't support maven currently. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
https://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/Maven_Notes |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> >> The bottom line appears to be that java for Linux sucked, got better, |
| 25 |
> >> but still sucks and will continue to suck for the foreseeable future. |
| 26 |
> >> Yes? |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> > No. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> I'm not looking for a yes/no altercation; look forward to more info :) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> -Thufir |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Java will 'suck' until the new java system can be stabilized. After that it |
| 35 |
will 'rock'. |
| 36 |
Look around: |
| 37 |
http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/java/wiki/ |
| 38 |
and |
| 39 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/java/index.xml |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
Archives