Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o>
To: Vincent Schut <schut@×××××××××.nl>
Cc: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:46:29
Message-Id: 443D8354.2000904@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-java] Re: Bugs submission by Vincent Schut
Vincent Schut wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:30:55 +0200, Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o> > wrote: > >> Vincent Schut wrote: >>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:02:48 +0200, Joshua Nichols >>> <nichoj-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote: >>>>> Miroslav Šulc <miroslav.sulc@...> writes: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> where should we submit bugs related to migration overlay? Should >>>>>> we use >>>>>> bugs.gentoo.org? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm afraid that the b.g.o maintainers wouldn't like it much... >>>>> Maybe there should be some thread / page in the javaexperimental >>>>> trac? >>>>> (and I don't think that posting it here is best, I was corrected >>>>> once) >>>>> >>>>> But on the other hand, some METABUG in b.g.o shouldn't be a problem, >>>>> like the jdk-1.5 METABUG maybe? And the maintainers should know >>>>> about it >>>>> beforehand, so they wouldn't dismiss such reports as INVALID or >>>>> WONTFIX. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I actually don't think using bugs.gentoo.org would be too bad. >>>> Although, it would be preferred if bugs directly to >>>> java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, so we don't drive >>>> bug-wranglers crazy. To this end, I made a 'bookmarkable template' >>>> and setup a tinyurl for it: >>>> >>>> *http://tinyurl.com/ofzha* >>>> >>>> Please use this for reporting migration-related bugs. It should be >>>> preset to be assigned to >>>> java-aBrp7R+bbdUdnm+yROfE0A@××××××××××××.org, block the migration >>>> bug, and will have [migration-overlay] in the title. >>> >>> I tried using the tinyurl link to file a bug about tomcat (bug nr. >>> 127949), but I think it still went to the normal bug-wranglers. See >>> the following reply >>> I got: >>> >>> Display all headersSubject: [Bug 127949] [migration-overlay] >>> tomcat-5.5.16 works for amd64 >>> To: schut@×××××××××.nl >>> From: bugzilla-daemon@g.o >>> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:05:09 +0000 >>> >>> --------- start forward --------- >>> Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949 >>> Secure: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127949 >>> >>> >>> jakub@g.o changed: >>> >>> What |Removed |Added >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> CC| |java@g.o >>> Status|NEW |RESOLVED >>> Resolution| |UPSTREAM >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------- Comment #1 from jakub@g.o 2006-03-29 01:05 PST ------- >>> Hmmmm, better ask the people who run the overlay... >>> >>> >>> --Configure bugmail: http://bugs.gentoo.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email >>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- >>> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. >>> --------- end forward --------- >> >> Well, first, the bug you filed really doesn't have anything to do >> with the migration overlay (because it's from the experimental >> overlay). That being said, I was working on keywording it around the >> time you filed it, and should be fixed. > > Ah, sorry. I assumed they belonged together. > Could someone please tell me then how/where to file bugs regarding the > experimental overlay?
I suppose we could use the same strategy as migration-overlay, ie put [java-experimental] in the summary, and assign the bug directly to java@g.o.
> > Vincent. >> >> As for why it got assigned to bug-wranglers... I think there's an >> issue with bugzilla where you can't switch between simple and expert >> modes for filing bug. I suspect that this happened with the upgrade a >> bit back, and you're stuck with whatever mode you were using at that >> time. The feature for assigning directly to someone (ie >> java@g.o) is one of the features from expert, so this would >> explain why it didn't take effect. >> >> So, I'll try to have a word with the bug wranglers to make sure these >> don't get resolved this way. >> >> - Josh
-- gentoo-java@g.o mailing list