Archives
Archives
| From: | Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Vlastimil Babka <caster@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-java@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-java] generation-2 java eclass | ||
| Date: | Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:05:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | 9e0cf0bf0609211104n79f51d40vab4acf9fb66546a1@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-java] generation-2 java eclass by Vlastimil Babka |
||
| 1 | On 9/21/06, Vlastimil Babka <caster@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > No, EXPORT_FUNCTIONS is for exporting the phases itself, not phase |
| 3 | > hooks. Both seem to solve conflict in a way that the later |
| 4 | > defined/inherited wins, so in the end you get one phase function and one |
| 5 | > phase hook. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Thanks! |
| 8 | |
| 9 | But what happens if two eclasses have phase hook? |
| 10 | Both of them should be called, right? |
| 11 | But if one overwrite the other, only the last one will be called. |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |