1 |
On 4/22/07, William L. Thomson Jr. <wltjr@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 18:48 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote: |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > the governance issues raised by the apache open letter are still |
5 |
> > outstanding and unresolved. the story of the first decade of the JCP |
6 |
> > has very much been intertwined with the story of jakarta and the |
7 |
> > relationship between apache and sun. it's unclear ATM whether this |
8 |
> > relationship will survive. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> From what I have seen and heard that relationship ended some time ago. I |
11 |
> do not believe any Sun peeps are committing to apache/jakarta projects. |
12 |
|
13 |
jakarta has been split into top level projects |
14 |
|
15 |
there is plenty of activity elsewhere at apache involving committers |
16 |
with links to sun. see for example |
17 |
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/river.html, |
18 |
http://db.apache.org/jdo/, http://shale.apache.org/ (i could do on but |
19 |
won't). however, i'm not sure how many of those work on apache code as |
20 |
part of their job. |
21 |
|
22 |
> From poking around glassfish-servlet-api seems to be based on jakarta |
23 |
> tomcat sources, which is basically Tomcat 4.x(maybe 5.0.x, surely not |
24 |
> 5.5.x). |
25 |
|
26 |
that doesn't surprise me |
27 |
|
28 |
> Since Tomcat as of 4.x was the official reference implementation of |
29 |
> servlet 2.3/jsp 1.2 api's. But not clear if that's the case for 5.0 or |
30 |
> 5.x 2.4/2.0, and surely not with 6.x 2.5/2.1. |
31 |
|
32 |
J2EE1.4 (2.4) RI contains tomcat but i don't think there's a separate |
33 |
RI for the servlet container specification |
34 |
|
35 |
> Seems there were some differences there amongst developers, and it has |
36 |
> been pretty much completely severed. |
37 |
|
38 |
most of the 3.x/4.x tomcat developers have moved onto new open source |
39 |
projects. i don't know of any who are working on servlet containers |
40 |
anymore outside apache. |
41 |
|
42 |
> I also noticed in glassfish some |
43 |
> sun-commons stuff, so not sure if they are duplicating that as well. |
44 |
|
45 |
most likely that's just part of their effort to open sourcing most of |
46 |
their code base |
47 |
|
48 |
> No clue where all this is going, aside from having multiple |
49 |
> implementations for allot of things. But surely seems as if there has |
50 |
> been a fork. |
51 |
|
52 |
the fork really happened back with the tomcat 3.0 donation. the apache |
53 |
implementation has been independent since then. |
54 |
|
55 |
- robert |
56 |
-- |
57 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |