| 1 |
> Alistair Bush wrote: |
| 2 |
> > argo-uml should be added to the 'in portage' list. or do you |
| 3 |
> consider |
| 4 |
> > that to be for a workstation. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> Yeah, I'd put that more as a development tool. I'm looking for |
| 7 |
> like the |
| 8 |
> Java equivilants of beagle, banshee, tomboy, etc. |
| 9 |
> > another that is in portage but isn't complied from source is |
| 10 |
> mercury. |
| 11 |
> > Has anyone decided to try tackle this beast? If not i'll try to |
| 12 |
> start |
| 13 |
> > tackling this beast |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> There isn't any work to compile from source as far as I'm aware |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> -- |
| 18 |
> Joshua Nichols |
| 19 |
> Gentoo/Java - Project Lead |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> gentoo-java@g.o <mailto:gentoo-java@g.o> mailing list |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> 2006/8/11, Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o <mailto:nichoj@g.o>>: |
| 24 |
Yeah I should have looked at the website first. I'll just have to find |
| 25 |
something else :) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I was thinking that because most desktop Java programs are within |
| 28 |
categories that don't scream java ( ie dev-java vs net-im ) we should |
| 29 |
create a 'Featured Java Program' of the month. This will not only get |
| 30 |
ppl using the packages (and also hopefully helping to test them) but |
| 31 |
hopefully contributing to this project (hopefully). |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
Archives