| 1 |
Hello, |
| 2 |
I'm new to this list, so sorry if i'm a little disoriented. |
| 3 |
As far as I know there's only one gentoo distribution, so what's the |
| 4 |
difference if argo-uml is for a workstation or not? I've read that Eclipse, |
| 5 |
Tomcat, etc. are ported to Gentoo, why not argo-uml? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Thanks in advance! |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
2006/8/11, Joshua Nichols <nichoj@g.o>: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Alistair Bush wrote: |
| 12 |
> > argo-uml should be added to the 'in portage' list. or do you consider |
| 13 |
> > that to be for a workstation. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> Yeah, I'd put that more as a development tool. I'm looking for like the |
| 16 |
> Java equivilants of beagle, banshee, tomboy, etc. |
| 17 |
> > another that is in portage but isn't complied from source is mercury. |
| 18 |
> > Has anyone decided to try tackle this beast? If not i'll try to start |
| 19 |
> > tackling this beast |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> There isn't any work to compile from source as far as I'm aware |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -- |
| 24 |
> Joshua Nichols |
| 25 |
> Gentoo/Java - Project Lead |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
Archives