Gentoo Archives: gentoo-java

From: "Miroslav S(ulc" <miroslav.sulc@××××××××.cz>
To: gentoo-java@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-java] Apache Directory Server
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 23:43:12
Message-Id: 455119B5.4040700@startnet.cz
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-java] Apache Directory Server by Yannick Menager
1 So I put your ebuild in overlay and updated the bug. I have few
2 suggestions to your ebuild:
3
4 1) it could use packages from Gentoo instead of the bundled ones
5 (commons-cli, commons-logging, concurrent-util, xerces, log4j, mx4j etc.)
6
7 2) directories in /opt/geronimo/var should be symlinked to appropriate
8 places
9 suggested locations:
10 config -> /etc/geronimo/config
11 security -> /etc/geronimo/security
12 log -> /var/log/geronimo
13 temp -> /var/tmp/geronimo
14 these symlinks have two reasons - first reason is the files are
15 found where they are expected to be (config files in /etc, log files in
16 /var/log), second reason is that config files will be auto-protected so
17 they will not be overwritten on geronimo upgrade
18
19 We are still busy with packaging jboss so we do not have time to work
20 on/improve geronimo ebuild but if you decide to work on it further then
21 we can give you some guidance either here or in #gentoo-java as Alistair
22 wrote before. You can find me there under nick fordfrog and Alistair is
23 ali_bush.
24
25 Thank you for providing geronimo ebuild and I hope we will hear some
26 news from you about geronimo ebuild or we will meet at irc.
27
28 ---
29 Miroslav
30
31
32 Yannick Menager wrote:
33 > I just tried to do so, but i can't seem to be able to logon to
34 > bugzilla, even resetted the password, but it won't allow logon
35 > *sigh*... Could someone please take the files directly from my
36 > overlay at https://svn.jguild.com/gentoo-overlay/www-servers/geronimo/
37 > and put them on bugzilla
38 >
39 > Miroslav S wrote:
40 >> You can attach it here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115506
41 >>
42 >> --
43 >> Miroslav
44 >>
45 >> Yannick Menager wrote:
46 >>
47 >>> Actually i have an ebuild for geronimo, but it's a binary-based one.
48 >>> Should i contribute so that there's something until someone write a
49 >>> source one ?
50 >>>
51 >>> Alistair Bush wrote:
52 >>>
53 >>>> Jose That does sound interesting.
54 >>>>
55 >>>> At present all J2EE activity is towards trying to package JBoss on
56 >>>> Gentoo (sanely). Geronimo is on the list of J2EE implementations
57 >>>> that we (fordforg and myself) are planing on looking at.
58 >>>>
59 >>>> If you would like to attempt to package Geronimo we would be happy go
60 >>>> give you advice, either thru the mailing list or on
61 >>>> irc://freenode/#gentoo-java
62 >>>>
63 >>>> (The above is a blantant attempt to get more worker ants for the J2EE
64 >>>> effort).
65 >>>>
66 >>>> I personally was considering attempting to package the glassfish
67 >>>> project after jboss but I may now consider Geronimo (or do them
68 >>>> jointly)
69 >>>>
70 >>>>
71 >>>> Alistair
72 >>>>

Attachments

File name MIME type
miroslav.sulc.vcf text/x-vcard

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-java] J2EE compatability Alistair Bush <alistair.bush@×××××.com>