| 1 |
That sounds like a good idea. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 1/17/07, Vlastimil Babka <caster@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 6 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Alistair Bush wrote: |
| 9 |
> > I have also though of going thru bugs.gentoo.org |
| 10 |
> > <http://bugs.gentoo.org> and reassigning the priority of bugs into |
| 11 |
> > categories (rather a large job for anyone who has other projects they |
| 12 |
> > want to get kicking). |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> And I would love to mark stable/keyword requests in a way that I can |
| 15 |
> filter them easily. They are assigned to us but we are not the ones |
| 16 |
> solving them :) Be it a special component or keyword, or some unified |
| 17 |
> form of summary. I see there are already STABLE and TESTED keywords for |
| 18 |
> arch testers to mark stuff they've tested, so maybe add something |
| 19 |
> STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ? What do you think? If it's sane, it should |
| 20 |
> probably be discussed on gentoo-dev as some global policy. |
| 21 |
> - -- |
| 22 |
> Vlastimil Babka (Caster) |
| 23 |
> Gentoo/Java |
| 24 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> iD8DBQFFrXT5tbrAj05h3oQRAtj7AJ9ydkaYZBKom7qZ0R6/lTlpSqbnHgCfWvKl |
| 29 |
> hs3etexbXWaWM8N6WTtOHQQ= |
| 30 |
> =ndHV |
| 31 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
Archives