1 |
Do we still have a list generated that tells us of all the gen-1 packages |
2 |
remaining? |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
On 1/17/07, Alistair Bush <alistair.bush@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> That sounds like a good idea. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> On 1/17/07, Vlastimil Babka <caster@g.o> wrote: |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
12 |
> > Hash: SHA1 |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Alistair Bush wrote: |
15 |
> > > I have also though of going thru bugs.gentoo.org |
16 |
> > > <http://bugs.gentoo.org > and reassigning the priority of bugs into |
17 |
> > > categories (rather a large job for anyone who has other projects they |
18 |
> > > want to get kicking). |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > And I would love to mark stable/keyword requests in a way that I can |
21 |
> > filter them easily. They are assigned to us but we are not the ones |
22 |
> > solving them :) Be it a special component or keyword, or some unified |
23 |
> > form of summary. I see there are already STABLE and TESTED keywords for |
24 |
> > arch testers to mark stuff they've tested, so maybe add something |
25 |
> > STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ? What do you think? If it's sane, it should |
26 |
> > probably be discussed on gentoo-dev as some global policy. |
27 |
> > - -- |
28 |
> > Vlastimil Babka (Caster) |
29 |
> > Gentoo/Java |
30 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
31 |
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) |
32 |
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > iD8DBQFFrXT5tbrAj05h3oQRAtj7AJ9ydkaYZBKom7qZ0R6/lTlpSqbnHgCfWvKl |
35 |
> > hs3etexbXWaWM8N6WTtOHQQ= |
36 |
> > =ndHV |
37 |
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
38 |
> > -- |
39 |
> > gentoo-java@g.o mailing list |
40 |
> > |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> |