Archives
Archives
| From: | Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-mips@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-mips] Reducing the number of the MIPS supported stages | ||
| Date: | Mon, 05 May 2014 23:31:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAEdQ38GLOTA85huVhhHRSqMvwXctrNo+9quKpjQJcNxwzvg5gQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-mips] Reducing the number of the MIPS supported stages by Joshua Kinard |
||
| 1 | On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > And I don't see a point in doing an R10K-specific mips4 build. The standard |
| 3 | > mips4 build is good enough, and users of R10K systems can rebuild to gain |
| 4 | > the R10K enhancements if needed. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | That's not true, as far as I'm aware. glibc for instance has |
| 7 | compile-time work-arounds for R10k errata. Hangs result without the |
| 8 | fix. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-mips] Reducing the number of the MIPS supported stages | Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o> |