| 1 |
On 05/06/2014 12:32 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 05/06/2014 03:07 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 05/06/2014 01:09 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 05/05/2014 19:36, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>>> I cannot speak for anything outside of the standard/original MIPS |
| 7 |
>>>>> ISAs, but |
| 8 |
>>>>> I thought we killed off mips1 long ago. When did that come back? |
| 9 |
>>>>> Almost |
| 10 |
>>>>> anything out there should be able to handle mips2 at a bare minimum |
| 11 |
>>>>> (only |
| 12 |
>>>>> R2000 and R3000-based systems, like certain DECStations, would need |
| 13 |
>>>>> mips1). |
| 14 |
>>>>> mips2 is also the branch point for the mips32r* ISAs, so if any |
| 15 |
>>>>> of the |
| 16 |
>>>>> original, 32-bit ISAs should be kept, that would be mips2. mips1 |
| 17 |
>>>>> can go. |
| 18 |
>>>> |
| 19 |
>>>> We've had this discussion before. If you're going to have >mips2 |
| 20 |
>>>> stages, then there's zero reason to have mips2 stages since mips2 |
| 21 |
>>>> effectively doesn't exist. |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>>> It's been a while, but I thought we only kept a mips2 stage1 around for |
| 24 |
>>> those that wanted a baseline to build their own stage2 or stage3's from. |
| 25 |
>>> You can do this with a mips1 as well, but mips2 is, more or less, the |
| 26 |
>>> baseline from which all other possible ISAs and stages can be built |
| 27 |
>>> from, as |
| 28 |
>>> long as you don't care about R2k or R3k CPUs. stage3's can be the |
| 29 |
>>> higher |
| 30 |
>>> mips32r* ISAs. |
| 31 |
>>> |
| 32 |
>>> I personally don't see a point in having mips1 or mips2 stage3's, only a |
| 33 |
>>> stage1 to use as a bootstrap for new machines or ISAs. |
| 34 |
>>> |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
>> (picking up a random thread) |
| 37 |
>> |
| 38 |
>> Ok thanks for the replies. |
| 39 |
>> |
| 40 |
>> Ok I think it's safe to proceed with the following: |
| 41 |
>> - Stop mips1 builds (we don't have mips2) |
| 42 |
>> - Reduce the frequency to once-a-year for mips3 and mips4. Updating |
| 43 |
>> these stages every year with catalyst will be a lot of fun ;) |
| 44 |
>> |
| 45 |
>> @kumba: You mentioned too many times that I wanted to "drop" support for |
| 46 |
>> mips3 and mips4. I never said that (I am sort-of tired keep repeating |
| 47 |
>> that). All I said (again) was to reduce the frequency or stop building |
| 48 |
>> them at all. Users can still get an existing mips3/mips4 stage3 and |
| 49 |
>> update themselves |
| 50 |
>> |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> mipsel3 is used for the lemote. Are you sure we should drop it? |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
No, I can still do that. |
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-- |
| 58 |
Regards, |
| 59 |
Markos Chandras |
Archives