1 |
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 7:26 AM Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Historically, the foundations affairs have been organised so that a |
4 |
> quorum at members meetings is never required, thus this is a non |
5 |
> problem. |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
It is never required as long as you just want to maintain the status quo... |
9 |
|
10 |
> Further, I see very few signs of people who actually want to participate |
11 |
> in the foundation coming forward. If these people existed, they could |
12 |
> start today. The foundation needs the offices of Secretary and Treasurer |
13 |
> filled. |
14 |
|
15 |
... and this would be the status quo. |
16 |
|
17 |
Well, I guess that is a stretch. It is more normal for the offices to |
18 |
be filled, and merely inactive. |
19 |
|
20 |
But, hey, we might yet see the Foundation file a tax return sometime |
21 |
in our lifetimes... |
22 |
|
23 |
(Not knocking the work Robin has done - it just seems to me that a |
24 |
system that requires sporadic individual heroics to almost function is |
25 |
fundamentally broken. I'm not convinced that anything other than a |
26 |
complete re-design could fix this, perhaps going as far as not having |
27 |
any legal entity at all.) |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Rich |