1 |
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Summers |
4 |
> <quantumsummers@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > Our trademark registration for both the wordmark "GENTOO" and our "G" |
6 |
> > Logo are perpetual (as of last year's filing) and cover national (USA) |
7 |
> > and applicable international usage (i.e. with countries we have |
8 |
> > treaties with governing this sort of thing). I am not aware of what |
9 |
> > Friends of Gentoo eV has in the way of a trademark. However based on |
10 |
> > the statements of our representative (Fenwick & West) to the USPTO, I |
11 |
> > was led to believe that the Gentoo Foundation Inc is the sole owner of |
12 |
> > the aforementioned marks. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > If there is a need I can contact our rep for clarification. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> My understanding is that US courts don't really recognize the |
17 |
> jurisdiction of any other courts. If some company that generally does |
18 |
> business outside the US happens to have any property at all in the US |
19 |
> or a country the US has a lot of influence over and they harm the |
20 |
> Gentoo mark, legally we could probably do bad things to them. The |
21 |
> reach of the US isn't infinite, of course, but it goes pretty far. |
22 |
> I'm not commenting at all as to whether we should do such things, or |
23 |
> whether US courts should be the way they are - I'm speaking mainly to |
24 |
> our options. |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
I would exercise caution in speculating on what options are available to us |
28 |
(nominally that is the job of counsel.) |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
> |
32 |
> I guess my point is that in the US trademarks are very well-protected. |
33 |
> Hence we should be careful about implying that our mark is weaker |
34 |
> than it actually is, because that will actually make it weaker. My |
35 |
> understanding is that as far as any US court is concerned there is |
36 |
> only one Gentoo on the entire planet and it is the Gentoo Foundation, |
37 |
> unless we actually limit ourselves. |
38 |
> |
39 |
|
40 |
So I agree in principal here. |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
> |
44 |
> All that said, it would probably make sense at some point to try to |
45 |
> combine with the e.V. or at least come to some kind of agreement on |
46 |
> scope for the two organizations. As far as I'm aware the Gentoo |
47 |
> Foundation is the only one footing the day-to-day bills and if I had |
48 |
> to guess I'd say the majority of our funding for conferences/etc goes |
49 |
> to Europe as well. I'm sure the e.V. does great things too. |
50 |
> |
51 |
|
52 |
I'm unsure what legal agreements (if any) the Gentoo Foundation currently |
53 |
has with Gentoo e.V. |
54 |
|
55 |
I refuse to let this speculation continue though. If you don't know what |
56 |
Gentoo e.V is doing, |
57 |
I recommend not speculating further on the list and simply engage them in |
58 |
conversation about it. They are nice folks ;) |
59 |
|
60 |
They have a website: https://www.gentoo-ev.org/ |
61 |
Here are their trademark guidelines: https://www.gentoo-ev.org/wiki/Marke |
62 |
|
63 |
I'm not sure what their budget is, or what they spend their money on. I |
64 |
know they sell stuff at conferences (T-shirts, mugs, pins, etc.) |
65 |
|
66 |
-A |
67 |
|
68 |
|
69 |
|
70 |
> Rich |
71 |
> |
72 |
> |