Gentoo Archives: gentoo-perl

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-perl@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] why different ebuilds for perl and libperl?
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:11:54
Message-Id: 1166188291.24991.0.camel@sys947.dtic.mil
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-perl] why different ebuilds for perl and libperl? by Christian Hartmann
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 08:08 +0100, Christian Hartmann wrote:
> IIRC we decided on merging libperl and perl in the future. >
but then came a discussion on -dev about how the static flag wasn't intended for deciding whether you wanted a static or dynamic library, which put this whole debate back into question as to whether it fit the "rules." -- -----o()o---------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E -----o()o----------------------------------------------

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-perl] why different ebuilds for perl and libperl? Antoine Raillon <antoine.raillon@××××××.net>