Gentoo Archives: gentoo-perl

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-perl@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] Big Perl Packages and g-cpan
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 13:45:07
Message-Id: 20070220084437.42c31435@sys947.dtic.mil
In Reply to: [gentoo-perl] Big Perl Packages and g-cpan by Michael Higgins
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:16:22 -0800
"Michael Higgins" <mhiggins@×××××××××××××.com> wrote:

> Hello, List -- > > Shot in the dark here... anyone on the list using any big, > multi-module perl packages but finding that g-cpan just ain't doin' > it for ya? > > If so, anyone find a suitable practice to avoid it? (Outside of > making an ebuild, of course.) > > I've found that CPAN is just fine to use in the past. But g-cpan > doesn't seem to do much except get in the way when given a build of > any real complexity. > > It seems like maybe CPAN.pm could be patched to emerge any modules > maintained the portage when needed by CPAN. If I dump g-cpan, should > I also emerge -C any modules built with portage and build them with > CPAN? > > Any thoughts or advice much appreciated. > > Thanks, >
You know, if you gave me an example package I could see about getting g-cpan working for you ;) ~mike, g-cpan guy -- -----o()o---------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E -----o()o---------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-perl@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
RE: [gentoo-perl] Big Perl Packages and g-cpan Michael Higgins <mhiggins@×××××××××××××.com>