Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5: does doheader have a -r option, or is recursion implied? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:05:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 5054ED84.1070504@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5: does doheader have a -r option, or is recursion implied? by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On 09/15/2012 02:03 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 | > From e6ed3676bea254675b372645d5fc8f01d1e18eb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 |
| 3 | > From: =?UTF-8?q?Ulrich=20M=C3=BCller?= <ulm@g.o> |
| 4 | > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:56:15 +0200 |
| 5 | > Subject: [PATCH] doheader accepts -r option for recursion. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Looks good to me. |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Thanks, |
| 10 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5: does doheader have a -r option, or is recursion implied? | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |