Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5: does doheader have a -r option, or is recursion implied? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 18 Sep 2012 11:12:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20568.22275.609240.574062@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5: does doheader have a -r option, or is recursion implied? by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Sat, 15 Sep 2012, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > On 09/15/2012 02:03 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 4 | >> From e6ed3676bea254675b372645d5fc8f01d1e18eb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 |
| 5 | >> From: Ulrich Müller <ulm@g.o> |
| 6 | >> Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:56:15 +0200 |
| 7 | >> Subject: [PATCH] doheader accepts -r option for recursion. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > Looks good to me. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Committed to master. |