1 |
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 21:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Friday 07 April 2006 20:54, Ned Ludd wrote: |
3 |
> > Handling of the || () in ROOT!=/ via the -K option is not in that |
4 |
> > good of shape in 2.1_NXX and can't really be used. Till that's |
5 |
> > addressed 2.1(re-ping jason) in my eyes absolutely should |
6 |
> > not even be considered for any rc status. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Can you refresh my memory on what the issue is here? |
9 |
|
10 |
Example off the topof my head: |
11 |
|
12 |
FEATURES="buildpkg" ROOT=/ emerge gcc |
13 |
rm -rf /dev/shm/foo |
14 |
|
15 |
ROOT=/dev/shm/foo emerge gcc -pvK |
16 |
|
17 |
Notice how it selects the incorrect deps? |
18 |
IE: eselect cuz it's the first listed dep in the || ( ) vs the |
19 |
gcc-config |
20 |
|
21 |
I forget what the title of the subject was but I recall us |
22 |
talking about it a bit on the portage alias a month or two ago and you |
23 |
more or less stated it's not broken at this point it's just not been |
24 |
coded to handle such cases yet. Other ppl who do alot of work with |
25 |
either || () / $ROOT such as Donnie or Alec should also be |
26 |
able to give some insights also. |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
solar <solar@g.o> |
32 |
Gentoo Linux |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |