Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: solar <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:20:04
Message-Id: 1144433971.21411.52.camel@onyx
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? by Jason Stubbs
1 On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 21:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
2 > On Friday 07 April 2006 20:54, Ned Ludd wrote:
3 > > Handling of the || () in ROOT!=/ via the -K option is not in that
4 > > good of shape in 2.1_NXX and can't really be used. Till that's
5 > > addressed 2.1(re-ping jason) in my eyes absolutely should
6 > > not even be considered for any rc status.
7 >
8 > Can you refresh my memory on what the issue is here?
9
10 Example off the topof my head:
11
12 FEATURES="buildpkg" ROOT=/ emerge gcc
13 rm -rf /dev/shm/foo
14
15 ROOT=/dev/shm/foo emerge gcc -pvK
16
17 Notice how it selects the incorrect deps?
18 IE: eselect cuz it's the first listed dep in the || ( ) vs the
19 gcc-config
20
21 I forget what the title of the subject was but I recall us
22 talking about it a bit on the portage alias a month or two ago and you
23 more or less stated it's not broken at this point it's just not been
24 coded to handle such cases yet. Other ppl who do alot of work with
25 either || () / $ROOT such as Donnie or Alec should also be
26 able to give some insights also.
27
28
29
30 --
31 solar <solar@g.o>
32 Gentoo Linux
33
34 --
35 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>