Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 22:36:10
Message-Id: 1144449362.31659.18.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? by solar
1 On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 14:19 -0400, solar wrote:
2 > On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 21:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
3 > > On Friday 07 April 2006 20:54, Ned Ludd wrote:
4 > > > Handling of the || () in ROOT!=/ via the -K option is not in that
5 > > > good of shape in 2.1_NXX and can't really be used. Till that's
6 > > > addressed 2.1(re-ping jason) in my eyes absolutely should
7 > > > not even be considered for any rc status.
8 > >
9 > > Can you refresh my memory on what the issue is here?
10 >
11 > Example off the top of my head:
12 >
13 > FEATURES="buildpkg" ROOT=/ emerge gcc
14 > rm -rf /dev/shm/foo
15 >
16 > ROOT=/dev/shm/foo emerge gcc -pvK
17 >
18 > Notice how it selects the incorrect deps?
19 > IE: eselect cuz it's the first listed dep in the || ( ) vs the
20 > gcc-config
21
22 + When you already have a copy of gcc-config installed on / and in
23 .tbz2 format in ${PKGDIR}/All and no eselect anywhere.
24
25 Depstring: || ( app-admin/eselect-compiler
26 >=sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.12-r4 ) ...
27
28 Candidates: ['app-admin/eselect-compiler', '>=sys-libs/ncurses-5.2-r2']
29
30 Then compare with
31 ROOT=/dev/shm/foo emerge -pvk gcc
32
33
34 --
35 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
36 Gentoo Linux
37
38 --
39 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon? Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>