| 1 |
On 03/03/2011 09:47 AM, Michael wrote: |
| 2 |
> Zac Medico wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> It seems like you wouldn't have to modify the code that your patch |
| 5 |
>> modifies, since essentially what you want is --autounmask except that |
| 6 |
>> you want to skip the part about editing config files. Also note that |
| 7 |
>> there is an existing feature request to edit config files automatically: |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=345775 |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Interesting, especially #258371 as referenced by the above - it seems to be |
| 12 |
> exactly what I was after. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> If I'm way off even in terms of code location, where would a more |
| 15 |
> appropriate place for me to hack this be? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Inside depgraph._resolve(), it returns False if |
| 18 |
self._dynamic_config._needed_use_config_changes is non-empty. You want |
| 19 |
to add an option that causes it to return True instead. Also, you'll |
| 20 |
need to propagate these changes to the config.setcpv() method somehow, |
| 21 |
so that the changes will be applied by the Scheduler at build time. |
| 22 |
Normally, the config.setcpv() method calculates USE based on config |
| 23 |
files, but you want it override the config files with whatever values |
| 24 |
the depgraph's _needed_use_config_changes contains. |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Thanks, |
| 27 |
Zac |
Archives