Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Cc: java@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Add a couple new warnings to QA check
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:25:51
Message-Id: 45FEAB48.1030609@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Add a couple new warnings to QA check by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
2 > On Monday 19 March 2007, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
3 >> To this end it would also be useful if the QA notices were _all_ sent to
4 >> the elog report; the "Files were installed with user/group portage" one
5 >> is, but I don't think any of the others are.
6 >
7 > add "qa" to your elog classes and any messages that still arent sent arent
8 > properly using the eqawarn func and should be trivial to fix
9 > -mike
10
11 Is eqawarn something we can use in eclasses? We have quite a few QA
12 checks in the java eclasses that could potentially make use of this
13 function. If it's not part of the public API we can of course just if it
14 exists and fall back to echo.
15
16 Regards,
17 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies