Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:41:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200604100841.20561.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? by Ned Ludd |
||
| 1 | On Monday 10 April 2006 08:08, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 | > On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 02:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 3 | > > What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals |
| 4 | > > FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any |
| 5 | > > trouble with them. Are there any arguments against making them default? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > This is would qualify as core change. Please post this on the -dev ml. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | agreed, this is the inappropriate forum for such a change |
| 10 | -mike |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |