Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES?
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:36:09
Message-Id: 443AB388.5050303@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] should we add userpriv and usersandox to make.globals FEATURES? by Mike Frysinger
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Mike Frysinger wrote:
5 > On Monday 10 April 2006 08:08, Ned Ludd wrote:
6 >> On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 02:24 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
7 >>> What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals
8 >>> FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any
9 >>> trouble with them. Are there any arguments against making them default?
10 >> This is would qualify as core change. Please post this on the -dev ml.
11 >
12 > agreed, this is the inappropriate forum for such a change
13 > -mike
14
15 Okay, I'll post it there instead, along with my question about usersandbox deprecation.
16
17 Zac
18 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
20
21 iD8DBQFEOrOH/ejvha5XGaMRAvr2AJ9BNq9YslFwaUds7H+DMIWqCI6HPwCfYfU+
22 uK2l6RgMyO/fP63bXwb6lGM=
23 =GLtN
24 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 --
26 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list