Archives
Archives
| From: | Philipp Riegger <lists@××××××××××××.de> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:52:58 | ||
| Message-Id: | F4D7F25F-9B6E-4A29-80C4-9D03867F0520@anderedomain.de | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> | ||
| 1 | On Apr 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >> But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion. |
| 4 | >> If i |
| 5 | >> post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache |
| 6 | >> even if i |
| 7 | >> have FEATURES="confcache", because emerge --info does not say if i |
| 8 | >> have |
| 9 | >> emerged confcache and, if i have emerged it, which version it is. |
| 10 | >> I think |
| 11 | >> this should also be listed in emerge --info. |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > Very good point. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Should i file a bug on this? |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Philipp |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Portage Features That Depend on Binaries [WAS: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon? ] | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |