1 |
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 14:23 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 08 March 2007, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
3 |
> > As we all know, setting LC_ALL and friends can cause all sorts of |
4 |
> > trouble in package builds. However, many users really appreciate |
5 |
> > being able to set it so that errors from the compiler etc are in their |
6 |
> > own language. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> we've fixed our documents so users should be setting LANG, not LC_ALL |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > It occurs to me that during emerge, only LC_MESSAGES is actually useful |
11 |
> > for the user, to help interpret build errors. LC_COLLATE and the |
12 |
> > others don't give the user any benefit in the emerge process. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > So how about if LANG or LC_* are set, portage would set LC_MESSAGES and |
15 |
> > clear the rest? |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Is there any real advantage to the user having LC_* set apart from |
18 |
> > LC_MESSAGES? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> to answer the question directly, i think you're correct in that only |
21 |
> LC_MESSAGES is a benefit to the user and screwing with the localization |
22 |
> variables as suggested seems pretty sane |
23 |
> |
24 |
> hoooooooooooooooowever, ;) |
25 |
> while i see the direction you're looking to go and the burdens you're looking |
26 |
> to relieve, i think this just puts us back to the state that i disagree |
27 |
> with ... namely that we shouldnt be ignoring these sort of problems, we |
28 |
> should be fixing them |
29 |
|
30 |
Seems a forced ignore would fix them. (problem solved! next bug..) |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
34 |
Gentoo Linux |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |