| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Alec Warner wrote: |
| 5 |
> My only concern is about consistency. IE the portage backend (if I |
| 6 |
> recall correctly) should return all matching nodes; emerge would then |
| 7 |
> take that list and find the first one that matches in the vdb. However |
| 8 |
> it becomes a bit difficult sometimes because emerge may do this vdb |
| 9 |
> preference but say, portageq, may not. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
emerge is supposed to be a high-level front-end though. If |
| 12 |
necessary, there's no reason why we can't add a portageq function |
| 13 |
that replicates emerge's "smart" category expansion. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Zac |
| 16 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 17 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
iD8DBQFF+czj/ejvha5XGaMRAsh5AJ0YEO+NQ7BJ8CyjRFEhNUQXJuw5MACg0Cdp |
| 20 |
2BtDRW7u8uOqspulqTw46Z0= |
| 21 |
=zur1 |
| 22 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives