| 1 |
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 10:46:29 -0400 |
| 2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I imagine they could ask you the exact same thing. Again, this is a |
| 8 |
> volunteer project. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If you don't like how something works, volunteer! |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I'll let the toolchain maintainers speak for themselves though. From |
| 13 |
> what I'm reading here it sounds like we should be happy to have a |
| 14 |
> toolchain at all. If people want them to do more than they're already |
| 15 |
> doing somebody will have to step up and help them do it. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Simply writing a policy and getting the council to approve it won't |
| 18 |
> make the work happen. ... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Yeah, doesn't have to be you. So we should rather look out for more |
| 21 |
people; maybe I'll try to have a stab at it at some later point, after |
| 22 |
I've revised everything I've committed. "Not enough manpower" is a |
| 23 |
valid reason to hold back removal, everything that wonders why EAPI |
| 24 |
0 is still around will agree with that... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
"... we should be happy to have a toolchain ..." confirms that; so, |
| 27 |
who's up for trying to accomplish an EAPI 5 or 6 eclass in an overlay? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
With kind regards, |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 33 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 36 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 37 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives