| 1 |
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 03:34:05 -0600 |
| 3 |
> Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 08:27:18 +0100 |
| 6 |
>> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Sure, I suppose if we were trying to break everything all at once |
| 9 |
>> that would be the most efficient way to go about it. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> What's stopping you? An overlay is perfect for this. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I imagine they could ask you the exact same thing. Again, this is a |
| 14 |
volunteer project. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If you don't like how something works, volunteer! |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'll let the toolchain maintainers speak for themselves though. From |
| 19 |
what I'm reading here it sounds like we should be happy to have a |
| 20 |
toolchain at all. If people want them to do more than they're already |
| 21 |
doing somebody will have to step up and help them do it. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Simply writing a policy and getting the council to approve it won't |
| 24 |
make the work happen. I'm working on a policy for copyright |
| 25 |
attribution/assignment/etc and one of my biggest concerns is how easy |
| 26 |
it will be to comply with. If it isn't easy, then either it won't be |
| 27 |
obeyed, or work that could otherwise get done won't get done because |
| 28 |
everybody is spending all their time checking copyright notices. I'd |
| 29 |
even prefer a suboptimal policy that gets followed to a "perfect" one |
| 30 |
that gets ignored. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Rich |
Archives