Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for Candidates (was: Questioning/Interviewing council nominees)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:38:01
Message-Id: CAEdQ38GN5d=XkviQfGVpLC+HFB38NYy=R54hcx1zY=O=Lw2X6Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for Candidates (was: Questioning/Interviewing council nominees) by hasufell
1 On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:27 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
2 > People agreed that the eclass is fine, but there was no real consensus
3 > about the question whether we actually want an eclass based solution.
4 > You can't have both, because it does not make sense.
5
6 You can, and I expect that we will. I don't want to start a big
7 discussion. I really just wanted to address this single point.
8
9 If the package manager provides a way to handle multilib more cleanly
10 I expect that we'll switch to it.