1 |
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:27 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> People agreed that the eclass is fine, but there was no real consensus |
3 |
> about the question whether we actually want an eclass based solution. |
4 |
> You can't have both, because it does not make sense. |
5 |
|
6 |
You can, and I expect that we will. I don't want to start a big |
7 |
discussion. I really just wanted to address this single point. |
8 |
|
9 |
If the package manager provides a way to handle multilib more cleanly |
10 |
I expect that we'll switch to it. |