Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 14:24:22
Message-Id: 20130407162329.1e685b27@TOMWIJ-GENTOO
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 by Markos Chandras
1 On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 11:51:30 +0100
2 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 7 April 2013 11:41, Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote:
5 >
6 > Errr so you are just repeating what I said? It works fine as it is, it
7 > breaks with other EAPIs so just leave it as it is.
8
9 Why should we wait until it becomes utterly broken? Why should it stop
10 improvement of the rest of the environment? Do you really want to keep
11 unmodifiable legacy software that appears to work to you but is broken
12 by design? It is always better to look at a future-proof solution now
13 instead of applying even more hacks in the future...
14
15 --
16 With kind regards,
17
18 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
19 Gentoo Developer
20
21 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
22 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
23 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature