| 1 |
Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 15:44:10 schrieb Tom Wijsman: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:42:49 +0200 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Johannes Huber <johu@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 08:08:53 schrieb Rich Freeman: |
| 6 |
> > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Andreas K. Huettel |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > > > Is Gentoo really a loose association of individualists who care |
| 10 |
> > > > about nothing but their own stuff, and give a $(/%& about users |
| 11 |
> > > > or the distribution as a whole? |
| 12 |
> > > > |
| 13 |
> > > > Because that's the impression I recently get on the mailing list, |
| 14 |
> > > > and I'm not really sure if it's worthwhile putting any more |
| 15 |
> > > > effort into it then. |
| 16 |
> > > |
| 17 |
> > > Some may say so, but the reality is that it has always been a united |
| 18 |
> > > effort - just not one in which everybody has a mailstop. |
| 19 |
> > > |
| 20 |
> > > Honestly, I've only seen 2-3 devs really digging in their feet over |
| 21 |
> > > systemd units, and that isn't going to cause a total meltdown. It |
| 22 |
> > > seems like the general problem of over possessive maintainers is |
| 23 |
> > > more widespread. That manifests itself in a million papercuts that |
| 24 |
> > > tend to drive individuals nuts but we've generally weathered them. |
| 25 |
> > > I think the solution there is a functioning devrel or other |
| 26 |
> > > disciplinary body with a faster time constant but lower amplitude. |
| 27 |
> > > |
| 28 |
> > > Rich |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > 100 points for you to put the word systemd into the thread. Could we |
| 31 |
> > just stop to take over on every thread? |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Can we stop assuming this is a "take over" of a thread? It's an example. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Not assuming, proofed on -dev ml a lot. Thanks. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Johannes Huber (johu) |
| 39 |
Gentoo Linux Developer / KDE Team |
| 40 |
GPG Key ID F3CFD2BD |
Archives