| 1 |
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:19:39 +0200 |
| 2 |
Johannes Huber <johu@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 15:44:10 schrieb Tom Wijsman: |
| 5 |
> > On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:42:49 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Johannes Huber <johu@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 08:08:53 schrieb Rich Freeman: |
| 9 |
> > > > Honestly, I've only seen 2-3 devs really digging in their feet |
| 10 |
> > > > over systemd units, and that isn't going to cause a total |
| 11 |
> > > > meltdown. It seems like the general problem of over possessive |
| 12 |
> > > > maintainers is more widespread. That manifests itself in a |
| 13 |
> > > > million papercuts that tend to drive individuals nuts but we've |
| 14 |
> > > > generally weathered them. I think the solution there is a |
| 15 |
> > > > functioning devrel or other disciplinary body with a faster |
| 16 |
> > > > time constant but lower amplitude. |
| 17 |
> > > |
| 18 |
> > > 100 points for you to put the word systemd into the thread. Could |
| 19 |
> > > we just stop to take over on every thread? |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > Can we stop assuming this is a "take over" of a thread? It's an |
| 22 |
> > example. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Not assuming, proofed on -dev ml a lot. Thanks. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Yet it is an example; so, it is still merely an assumption. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I'm yet to see this "take over" happen to this thread, there is none. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Your sub thread isn't constructive, it's provocative; stop it yourself. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
With kind regards, |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 36 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 39 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 40 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives