From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-02-25 | ||
Date: | Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:07:37 | ||
Message-Id: | 52F92363.40300@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-02-25 by "Andreas K. Huettel" |
1 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 | Hash: SHA1 |
3 | |
4 | As discussed on gentoo-dev ML and recently with the QA team, we have |
5 | no clear rule/policy about 'gtk' USE flags. Currently there are all |
6 | kinds of them: gtk, gtk2, gtk3. That looks inconsistent to me. |
7 | |
8 | The council should decide whether to allow: |
9 | * gtk only |
10 | * gtk2, gtk3, ..., but without 'gtk' |
11 | |
12 | mixing these two concepts is confusing from a usability POV. |
13 | I have no strong opinion on what to do. But we should not do both. |
14 | |
15 | links: |
16 | http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/255125 |
17 | http://us.generation-nt.com/answer/gentoo-dev-gtk2-gtk3-use-flags-help-212168702.html |
18 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420493 |
19 | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
20 | Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
21 | Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
22 | |
23 | iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS+SNjAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzSWIIAKMV/9olwc4EKkag+QyByT/4 |
24 | SHx08y4Ul/3DeZtxNykvFQ2ZgItlnxRZJaTkrbM0ZMs2/8u20ZtW3rV1S3B0Nte1 |
25 | HDZicsmE33X+iRHObErBp+MJvbqBRJvQynEtPSzAWb5lWdN5fjp4v6DZKUPplXYn |
26 | id8VSqDxK5y0v33uY0R+GWsOyUyIulp7FWDI2aKKOIaa24fOGIqQf7Npob7D8Q9w |
27 | FDwabtmbiUHL4rF2Qvy3KlvHUhv8ChDVZHBEYov+4mnJl0y+E6gwGvQICz3woYgk |
28 | hJRgzRO3FdIQqWkgRYrA67F95iaEKjaEeIrPh8IWgNq26kjBpJ1GK6BaR7F89S0= |
29 | =Vlmi |
30 | -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-02-25 | "Rick \\\"Zero_Chaos\\\" Farina" <zerochaos@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-02-25 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |