Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for Gentoo Council meeting on 2014-02-25
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:32:56
Message-Id: 530CC5B6.905@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for Gentoo Council meeting on 2014-02-25 by Samuli Suominen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 25/02/14 11:16 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
5 >
6 > On 25/02/14 18:12, Rich Freeman wrote:
7 >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o>
8 >> wrote:
9 >>> We acknowledge that our policy may not have been perfect but we
10 >>> need time to analyze claims brought up by/to the QA team to
11 >>> construct a proper proposal for a better policy that would
12 >>> satisfy everyone; hopefully in co-operation with a QA team.
13 >> Is there any reason to think that this analysis will come to a
14 >> different conclusion?
15 >>
16 >> I don't see any concerns on the list that weren't addressed
17 >> already. USE=gtk2 means build gtk2 support USE=gtk3 means build
18 >> gtk3 support USE="gtk2 gtk3" means build support for whichever
19 >> version the maintainer thinks is better (which is what USE=gtk
20 >> meant a week ago)
21 >
22 > And how does one select 'the best supported GTK+ for this
23 > application, selected by the package's maintainer.' ? I want latest
24 > best supported GTK+ enabled for all of my packages. I can't figure
25 > out the USE combination from those. You can't surely assume every
26 > user to review every single package and decide for himself after
27 > reading hours, days, weeks, if not even months various package
28 > ChangeLogs, NEWS files, and other possible ways upstreams are
29 > communicating with? And how does user know of all the mail that
30 > goes between upstream and package maintainers about what to choose
31 > for distribution?
32
33
34 ...? as per above, USE="gtk2 gtk3", in make.conf. No need to read
35 anything or track changelogs or anything else. Enable both in the
36 profile (I'm guessing they'll both probably be enabled by default in
37 the desktop profile or a sub-profile, tbh) and you're done.
38
39 If you (as a user) want to experiment with the one the maintainer
40 DIDN'T choose, then set a single specific version for that atom in
41 package.use
42
43
44 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
45 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
46
47 iF4EAREIAAYFAlMMxbYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDzGgD/VT5trwwNgxgx6Dc1tbOHiFU+
48 3SBbtcOcxZuTKemK+PIBAJ+uJNWpOzMh+HQV166/QWribofssZF4VTdVZfd+ncMt
49 =qBcA
50 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies