| 1 |
Am Sonntag, 7. April 2013, 04:05:11 schrieb Ryan Hill: |
| 2 |
> Toolchain packages, for better or worse, are built by eclass. We are not |
| 3 |
> forward-porting toolchain.eclass every time someone decides there are too |
| 4 |
> many EAPIs in the tree. Every change to that eclass breaks something (the |
| 5 |
> trick is to break things people don't care about any more and hope no one |
| 6 |
> notices). I don't know the ins and outs of glibc's eblits but I doubt |
| 7 |
> they would be simple to port either. I also don't know much about |
| 8 |
> toolchain-binutils.eclass, but it seems like it would be doable. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
So who are the people who do know the ins and outs? |
| 12 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_factor |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 17 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 18 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 19 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives