Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Cc: axs@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 20:13:53
Message-Id: 20140303211340.000a940c@pomiot.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11 by Ian Stakenvicius
1 Dnia 2014-03-03, o godz. 15:05:12
2 Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> napisał(a):
3
4 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
5 > Hash: SHA256
6 >
7 > On 03/03/14 02:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
8 > > Dnia 2014-03-03, o godz. 12:14:13 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
9 > > napisał(a):
10 > >
11 > >>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Anthony G Basile wrote:
12 > >>
13 > >>> I'm putting the call out there for any agenda items for the
14 > >>> next Council meeting, which will be held on March 11, 2014 at
15 > >>> 1900 UTC. This is short notice but we got off track because of
16 > >>> FOSDEM and we're going to try to get back on track.
17 > >>
18 > >> In February we have voted to "ban new EAPI 1 and 2 ebuilds". Now
19 > >> I've seen some commits where ebuilds were changed in place from
20 > >> EAPI 0 to EAPI 1.
21 > >>
22 > >> Can we clarify that the ban includes updating the EAPI in
23 > >> existing ebuilds?
24 > >
25 > > So how we are supposed to handle updating rev-deps to use proper
26 > > slot? Convert ancient versions to a new EAPI or just drop them
27 > > completely?
28 > >
29 >
30 > That's up to you, as maintainer, isn't it?
31
32 If I am fixing a few dozen ebuilds due to change in dependency package,
33 I'm not the maintainer.
34
35 --
36 Best regards,
37 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies