Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 22:36:39
Message-Id: 201304070037.28554.dilfridge@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 by Ryan Hill
1 Am Samstag, 6. April 2013, 23:43:14 schrieb Ryan Hill:
2 > On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:54:50 +0200
3 >
4 > Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
5 > > I'd be a little more proactive and deprecate EAPIs 0 and 1 immediately
6 > > (which would correspond to the 4 years mentioned above). When doing a
7 > > version or revision bump, the ebuild should be updated to use a newer
8 > > EAPI. There can be exceptions, e.g. for security bumps.
9 >
10 > Toolchain packages are EAPI 0 and we aren't changing.
11
12 That sounds a bit like "over my ..."
13 Care to elaborate why?
14
15
16 --
17
18 Andreas K. Huettel
19 Gentoo Linux developer
20 dilfridge@g.o
21 http://www.akhuettel.de/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies