Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Cc: rich0@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] OT - Tinderbox question
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 14:37:25
Message-Id: 20140516163658.435313d0@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] OT - Tinderbox question by Rich Freeman
1 On Fri, 16 May 2014 09:51:54 -0400
2 Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > I suspect the intent of their vote was that QA members could take
5 > action individually in the name of QA. [...]
6
7 You can read the meeting agenda ...
8
9 https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Meeting_Agenda
10
11 ..., which shows the intent of the vote; it originates from ...
12
13 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/3509
14
15 ..., which was brought up by Samuli.
16
17 --
18 With kind regards,
19
20 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
21 Gentoo Developer
22
23 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
24 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
25 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] OT - Tinderbox question Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>