Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 08:13:55
Message-Id: 21269.35640.365368.972918@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11 by Rich Freeman
1 >>>>> On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Rich Freeman wrote:
2
3 > I think we do need to be careful about not creating barriers to
4 > maintenance like this. If people are given the choice of doing a lot
5 > of work to make a small improvement vs not doing an improvement at
6 > all, they'll often pick the latter.
7
8 > We definitely want to phase out the old EAPIs, but changes to
9 > existing ebuilds shouldn't require bringing them fully up-to-date.
10 > It should be done if it makes sense, however (at the discretion of
11 > the person doing the work).
12
13 If changing ebuilds to a banned EAPI is allowed, then we can as well
14 lift the ban altogether: I could create a new ebuild under some
15 allowed EAPI, then change it to a banned one, and it would still be
16 within the rules.
17
18 That's not what I would call a consistent policy. In this case, we
19 should better revert our decision from February.
20
21 Ulrich

Replies