1 |
On 6/16/10 5:54 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: |
2 |
> As far as I know most if not all Gentoo developers do unpaid voluntary |
3 |
> work in and for Gentoo. So every single minute a Gentoo developer puts |
4 |
> into Gentoo is a gift, incontrast to understanding every other minute a |
5 |
> stolen one. How come such a wrong concept even made it into the process |
6 |
> of the council? Officially being marked as a slacker? Is that the only |
7 |
> way to ensure an active council? |
8 |
|
9 |
I think it's confusing you mention the council here. Council is there to |
10 |
make decisions. If people miss the meetings, we can't make decisions. |
11 |
|
12 |
Also, note that a council member can be proxied by other developer. |
13 |
|
14 |
> To get this mis-concept out again I need your help. |
15 |
> There is no such thing as slacking in Gentoo - no matter how many weeks |
16 |
> you ran without commits. It's time to get this understanding back to |
17 |
> its healthy counterpart. |
18 |
|
19 |
Could you explain more? Is it about people retiring because of that? |
20 |
|
21 |
If so, then I agree we should permit some "leaves of absence" or maybe |
22 |
even "sabbaticals" to keep talented people in the project, while |
23 |
allowing them to rest. |
24 |
|
25 |
Also, one can return after retiring. |
26 |
|
27 |
Paweł |