Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for Gentoo Council meeting on 2014-02-25
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:10:35
Message-Id: 530CEA90.8070302@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Agenda for Gentoo Council meeting on 2014-02-25 by Mart Raudsepp
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 Mart Raudsepp:
5 >
6 > We wrote this policy in the first place so that everyone can
7 > understand why we do things this way and we do not want anyone to
8 > mess with it without due explanation and justifications because in
9 > the end, we will be the ones (with other gtk based DE) maintaining
10 > this mess in tree.
11 >
12
13 This is just a gnome team policy and not tree policy. A LOT of people
14 do things completely different and I did not get much support from the
15 gnome team to stop the mess.
16
17 See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420493
18
19 I then complained to QA, because most people started to close bugs as
20 RESOLVED WONTFIX without good reason (including QA members).
21
22 I don't think this can be solved without a more definite answer than
23 "we recommend you do it this way", even if you rework your team policy.
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25
26 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTDOqQAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz3wwH/j1VoHla5Sms/dL4aF/C/Cvs
27 iTbwzgUL27rnVc95Uybte7EjNuisCiOP9NR3u3InlIMm8oDChs5eQDtPpEtOahAd
28 nfk61es4HNObf/xZo5w2eSVcbETU1jAIoDLgtCc2ReYGEEAPrc+khHkFh1aqrqDc
29 vSDYx8jMQi+rY4bHPKo/IxfX9JME4D/BXAPbFbQmFd23RrQ5MPjp9Fm//EWq4zbP
30 AdfRtPa6y0Gtl/O+SYpNo0h9DxfHOIspxPVxq3PARUI2troNdzz45JmFzJkErvxs
31 Xp488SfCty1YNDzg+6MIDHZ6wTmh97PumfXWr/+SbuzFu0s4bGCrYdBP43Ekg1A=
32 =b+y8
33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies