Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] The mis-concept of "slacking" in Gentoo
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 01:10:37
Message-Id: 4C1975F7.5010903@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] The mis-concept of "slacking" in Gentoo by Steve Dibb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 16-06-2010 17:28, Steve Dibb wrote:
>>> To get this mis-concept out again I need your help. >>> There is no such thing as slacking in Gentoo - no matter how many weeks >>> you ran without commits. It's time to get this understanding back to >>> its healthy counterpart. > > I'm not sure what problem you are trying to tackle. > > The way I see it, there are a few types of "slacker" status. > > There are those who are just plain busy, and can't respond in a timely > manner due to real-life issues. Then there are a group who just don't > have time for Gentoo as a regular maintenance task anymore, but still > participate in discussions, development, etc. Then there's the last > group who are completely unresponsive and inactive -- these are the ones > that are real blockers. > > I don't like the idea of pretending there's no such thing as slacking, > because there is. > > We do have a practical problem (though I don't know how serious it is). > We have healthy roll calls in some herds, but the developers are in a > certain range of active to unresponsive. When the herd is filled up, > this gives developers and users the impression that it *should* be well > tendered, but that may not be the case.
So everyone can have an idea, I'd suggest looking at the list of the open retirement bugs[1]. As there seems to be some confusion about the policies to retire developers, please read the undertakers page[2]. [1] - https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=Gentoo+Developers%2FStaff&component=Retirement&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=VERIFIED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=retirement%40gentoo.org&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= [2] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/undertakers/index.xml
> Steve >
- -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMGXX3AAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPBAYQAIuMselVRdv3I8y+L4cMci51 dTq4aCEHv8BxdNU4MeruKZLnmzJ+0C40p5tb9STy6e6A0gJSJDdqSov0PEL3kyzg jgFRvP5SXgQN1YyBwNb/Icqc29bVyRgaeUEmB6+OrRAJj9D1Cg1+GQV0x4SswviX RVUpePgBBzN/0Yu4ezLvWeUOTWxop1uvRYy5dBmhN8YPL42t7D+RrYwiy43g0Zp5 2OdPlb375Ffu1AgHO3srHoeyE4GrIvy9gTtasaecKQxFn5GUWpUZcqcUWc+ws07K 5VGoF/Bim9973M3bNw/qKp8Gm/WWJyRBFTK9exTAqskHHy4ZznElVf1+2ccNA16I rrLIYWRtsBMkNiYRt1jAV00qBQrqUco3vTHlEV2SuprqSqzN7BTBz5hHrGamGgIm 1tydn3ZIJEpU+WlImSQtq0l4G017JjocvFrlTKGIssR9rE98u3JVOboobOvUGilS z4WzPW2JfHuFdx4Kp3/L3DcLUqkoxdOnG1YA8nT04Fzz4FI2SeHvnQkqK4IiDo7Y QH95KlmvX5g+jqNWiSZlQCStg8TAaEvj4/y41Xw4X2WiQUnUvaVykdj+JFg8I68S NUOjDQKkmJvX4Tv5af0eH+fuLQ6wNXddSl8/AKP76SnF4EzJdGqx0pZMsGdw+lLs 4/FWU4QP3WUU8F3D3REn =5Hqa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies