Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2012-04-03
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:04:00
Message-Id: 20120321073831.GC84429@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2012-04-03 by Pacho Ramos
On 20-03-2012 22:34:14 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > My idea would be that we first vote if we want to address the issue. > > If this is accepted, then we would have to decide between the > > different solutions that have been proposed. > > > > We have attempted to collect all ideas here: > > <http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Alternate_EAPI_mechanisms> > > > From my point of view, both decisions could be made at the same meeting: > 1º Should we discuss it? -> Yes -> go to 2º // No -> end > 2º Discuss alternatives > > That would safe time in case you decide to address that issue and > wouldn't hurt in case you don't :)
IMO we don't have to waste a (part of a) meeting on deciding if we want to address the issue at all. We (council) should just reach that conclusion here on-list, so we can prepare for the actual votes in actual council meeting. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies