1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 06/18/2013 03:47 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
5 |
> On 06/18/2013 09:15 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 |
6 |
> 14:55:40 +0200 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
>>>> A tiny idea to improve the council just came to my mind: 1-2 |
8 |
>>>> representatives of the user community should be voted in. IMO |
9 |
>>>> there are a enough well known personalities in #gentoo, |
10 |
>>>> #gentoo-chat, from the forums or elsewhere. |
11 |
> The last time something like that was tried, we ended up with a |
12 |
> bunch of non-Gentoo-using prolific Off The Wall posters being |
13 |
> selected. That didn't exactly work out well. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> -- Ciaran McCreesh |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I was going to caution against this too. I've had similar |
18 |
> experiences on college committees where faculty invited students to |
19 |
> participate. They really didn't understand the issues and wasted |
20 |
> our time with non-sequitors. It was probably equally frustrating |
21 |
> to them because they tried but could not contribute. I understand |
22 |
> that some contributors are more active than some devs, but how |
23 |
> would the process differentiate? |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
That proposal cannot stand alone. Please respond to the concept I was |
28 |
pointing out, not a single point. |
29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
30 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
31 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
32 |
|
33 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRwGfCAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz1h0H/jCu+Ybgs+L82INw32utw9bM |
34 |
ANcp2pEwExsJcLLWaRQRpY889/FygwIIxfFaeIcstAqNMt8FwwQ1Yh+0MkLF2M5T |
35 |
sR3t9NQJV/TQqaD4fofO9IdPn628+5JGd0HUIAMkLM3sxl73apI6WfS2kh5ycHVN |
36 |
Or+0RA48Zwo3XeXvXy7gDC+1JoKkC1goRf7i7pzlYq8tzAnlLnY2GQpT7z9j42bl |
37 |
0sjV6SBl6tPN+Q9rtg0qqdQCq8aOGLz5uuLLq+gXp1LFrp1ytGCyrlkSXRJPij47 |
38 |
t4ZuiL1PDHRexJBkpa2DBdyJ1MuJr/GHpAs8102QYpbkc7U63pARIToC7Y6gnbc= |
39 |
=M79G |
40 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |