| 1 |
Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2014, 13:49:07 schrieb Rich Freeman: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > The role of the GLEP is to lock down the requirements, NOT the |
| 4 |
> > interface, or exact how-to instructions. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> If so, then I suggest we strip out everything but the requirements. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'm fine with approving the direction, but I would not want to make |
| 9 |
> the GLEP effective until the instructions are available somewhere. I |
| 10 |
> guess we can use the "Accepted" vs "Final" statues to distinguish |
| 11 |
> this. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Rich |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
To be honest, I find the idea a bit silly to now strip out the instructions. |
| 16 |
After all, from the text it should be clear what is requirement and what is |
| 17 |
additional information. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That said, since the council meeting is tomorrow and we need something as a |
| 20 |
base for discussion, I've made a stripped-down version of the GLEP (with all |
| 21 |
documentation, howtos and informal information removed), it's here: |
| 22 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Dilfridge/GLEP:1001a |
| 23 |
Requirements-wise it should be identical to the original version. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
The original, full version is here: |
| 26 |
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:63 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 31 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 32 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 33 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives