| 1 |
Dnia 2014-02-25, o godz. 11:12:44 |
| 2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I don't see any concerns on the list that weren't addressed already. |
| 5 |
> USE=gtk2 means build gtk2 support |
| 6 |
> USE=gtk3 means build gtk3 support |
| 7 |
> USE="gtk2 gtk3" means build support for whichever version the |
| 8 |
> maintainer thinks is better (which is what USE=gtk meant a week ago) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
...or for both, if maintainer feels like supporting both. Even if you |
| 11 |
will never use or care about both. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
So in the end, we have supposedly clear USE=gtk2 and USE=gtk3. Then we |
| 14 |
have USE="gtk2 gtk3" which sometimes builds one of them, sometimes |
| 15 |
both. And we have USE="-gtk2 -gtk3" which sometimes builds with no GUI |
| 16 |
and sometimes fails requesting to choose GUI (or maybe goes with |
| 17 |
default, again?). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
And then, we have binary packages that can be built for 4 combinations |
| 20 |
of which 2-3 would be meaningful and the remaining would be redundant. |
| 21 |
I'd call it a mess. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Best regards, |
| 25 |
Michał Górny |
Archives